ThatCamp Paris 2010 | Non-conférence sur les Digital humanities Paris, EHESS, 18 et 19 mai 2010

marzo 20, 2011

Manifesto for the Digital Humanities

agosto 26, 2010

Por Marin Dacos

Manifesto for the Digital Humanities

Context

We, professionals or observers of the digital humanities (humanités numériques) came together in Paris for THATCamp on May 18th and 19th, 2010.

Over the course of these two days, we discussed, exchanged, and collectively reflected upon what the digital humanities are, and tried to imagine and invent what they could become.

At the close of the camp – which represents but a first step – we propose to the research communities, and to all those involved in the creation, publication, valorization or preservation of knowledge, a manifesto for the digital humanities.

I. Definition

1. Society’s digital turn changes and calls into question the conditions of knowledge production and distribution.

2. For us, the digital humanities concern the totality of the social sciences and humanities. The digital humanities are not tabula rasa. On the contrary, they rely on all the paradigms, savoir-faire and knowledge specific to these disciplines, while mobilizing the tools and unique perspectives enabled by digital technology.

3. The digital humanities designate a “transdiscipline”, embodying all the methods, systems and heuristic perspectives linked to the digital within the fields of humanities and the social sciences.

II. Situation

4. We observe:

- that experiments in the digital domain of the social sciences and humanities have multiplied in the last half century. What have emerged most recently are centers for digital humanities – which at the moment are themselves only protoypes or areas of application specific to the approach of digital humanities;

- that computational and digital approaches have greater technical, and therefore economic, research constraints; that these constraints provide an opportunity to foster collaborative work;

- that while a certain number of proven methods exist, they are not equally known or shared;

- that there are many communities deriving from shared interests in practices, tools, and various interdisciplinary goals – encoding textual sources, geographic information systems, lexicometry, digitization of cultural, scientific and technical heritage, web cartography, datamining, 3D, oral archives, digital arts and hypermedia literatures, etc. – and that these communities are converging to form the field of digital humanities.

III. Declaration

5. We, professionals of the digital humanities, are building a community of practice that is solidary, open, welcoming and freely accessible.

6. We are a community without borders. We are a multilingual and multidisciplinary community.

7. Our objectives are the advancement of knowledge, the improvement of research quality in our disciplines, the enrichment of knowledge and of collective patrimony, in the academic sphere and beyond it.

8. We call for the integration of digital culture in the definition of the general culture of the twenty-first century.

IV. Guidelines

9. We call for open access to data and metadata, which must be documented and interoperable, both technically and conceptually.

10. We support the dissemination, exchange and free modification of methods, code, formats and research findings.

11. We call for the integration of digital humanities education within social science and humanities curricula. We also wish to see the creation of diplomas specific to the digital humanities, and the development of dedicated professional education. Finally, we want such expertise to be considered in recruitment and career development.

12. We commit to building a collective expertise based upon a common vocabulary, a collective expertise proceeding from the work of all the actors involved. This collective expertise is to become a common good. It is a scientific opportunity, but also an opportunity for professional insertion in all sectors.

13. We want to help define and propagate best practices, corresponding to needs identified within or across disciplines, which should derive and evolve from debate and consensus within the communities concerned. The fundamental openness of the digital humanities nevertheless assures a pragmatic approach to protocols and visions, which maintains the right to coexistence of different and competing methods, to the benefit of both thought and practice.

14. We call for the creation of scalable digital infrastructures responding to real needs. These digital infrastructures will be built iteratively, based upon methods and approaches that prove successful in research communities.

vía ThatCamp Paris 2010 | Non-conférence sur les Digital humanities Paris, EHESS, 18 et 19 mai 2010.


Socioinformatique des controverses | Socio-informatique et argumentation

noviembre 22, 2010

Socioinformatique des controverses

Date 2 novembre 2010

OUTILS ET MÉTHODES POUR LA SOCIOLOGIE DES DOSSIERS COMPLEXES

Francis Chateauraynaud, directeur d’études à l’EHESS

Josquin Debaz, chercheur au GSPR (EHESS)

Patrick Trabal, professeur à l’Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense

Du 8 novembre 2010 au 27 juin 2011, 2e et 4e lundis du mois de 15 à 18h

au 105 bd Raspail à Paris, salle 2

Conçu comme un lieu de croisement d’expériences de traitement de corpus de textes ou d’entretiens, le séminaire fonctionnera à la fois comme un lieu d’apprentissage à la construction individuelle d’une enquête socioinformatique, et comme un atelier collaboratif organisé dans l’esprit des digital humanities. S’il est orienté principalement, mais pas exclusivement, vers l’analyse sociologique des affaires et des controverses de longue durée, le séminaire pourra être l’occasion de proposer des formes originales de corpus. Chaque séance procédera en deux temps : la première partie (1 h 30) donnera lieu à l’exposé d’une recherche en cours utilisant des outils informatiques (Prospéro, Marlowe, Tirésias, Alceste, Pajek, Réseau-Lu, NVivo, et toutes sortes d’outils du web,…) ; la seconde partie sera consacrée à un travail collectif de construction, d’analyse et de comparaison des corpus de l’ensemble des participants.

Chaque participant au séminaire ayant présenté, en début d’année, un projet de corpus à construire ou à enrichir, on franchira, au fil des séances, les différentes étapes de traitement (indexations, codages, calculs, modélisations, exportations de tableaux et de résultats…). L’accent sera mis sur le choix des outils pertinents en fonction de la nature des investigations poursuivies, de sorte qu’à l’issue du séminaire les membres soient en mesure de produire un compte-rendu d’enquête (sous la forme d’un article, un rapport, un document de travail, ou une annexe méthodologique …) susceptible d’être publié (avec une première présentation dans ce carnet de recherche.

PROGRAMME 2010-2011

 

  1. Lundi 8 novembre : Francis Chateauraynaud, Josquin Debaz, Patrick Trabal
    Sociologie des controverses, Humanités numériques et Socio-Informatique. Présentation générale.
  2. Lundi 22 novembre : Patrick Trabal
    Points de vue épistémiques et modes de cumulativité des corpus.
  3. Lundi 13 décembre : Josquin Debaz
    Exploration fine des documents : entre herméneutique et structuration conceptuelle.
  4. Lundi 10 janvier 2011 : Francis Chateauraynaud
    De l’usage des formules dans l’analyse argumentative.
  5. Lundi 24 janvier 2011 : Gregory Salle (CNRS-Université Lille I)
    Prospéro derrière les barreaux : analyse de la controverse autour des Établissements pénitentiaires pour mineurs (EPM), 2002-2010
  6. Lundi 28 février : Delphine Loupsans (CEMAGREF Montpellier)
    Les experts du « bon état » dans l’élaboration de la Directive cadre européenne sur l’eau
  7. Lundi 14 mars : Equipe de l’ANR Chimères
    Chimères nano biotechnologiques et post-humanité 1.
  8. Lundi 28 mars : Equipe de l’ANR Chimères
    Chimères nano biotechnologiques et post-humanité 2.
  9. Lundi 11 avril : Patrick Trabal (sous réserve)
    Les forums internet sont-ils des corpus comme les autres ?
  10. Lundi 9 mai : Francis Chateauraynaud, Josquin Debaz, Patrick Trabal
    Social graphs versus semantic networks.
  11. Lundi 23 mai : Eric Guichard (ENSSIB Lyon)
    Cartographies, Internet et technologies d’écriture
    (titre provisoire)

Socioinformatique des controverses | Socio-informatique et argumentation.


Social Dynamics Laboratory

noviembre 21, 2010

Welcome to the Social Dynamics Laboratory

social dynamics laboratory logo

The Social Dynamics Laboratory members study the interplay between network topology and the dynamics of social interaction, using computational models, data from on-line networks, and laboratory experiments with human participants.We are supported by the National Science Foundation through the following grants:Human and Social Dynamics SES-0432917 and SES-0433086Cyberinfrastructure ToolsC BCS-0537606WebLab IIS-0705774Human Centered ComputingThe SDL Director is Michael Macy, Goldwin Smith Professor of Sociology at Cornell University.The Assistant Director is Chris Cameron, a PhD candidate at Cornell.Visit the “People” tab to learn about graduate students currently working in the lab and about recent activities.

vía Social Dynamics Laboratory.


Portals and KM: Interesting SNA tool at MIT

noviembre 14, 2010

May 03, 2004Interesting SNA tool at MITSocial Network Analysis SNA is another potential candidate for TBNT – see Social Networking in NYC. I had the pleasure of spending time last month with Peter Gloor of MIT Sloan CCS and the Dartmouth Tuck School. Peter is the former head of the eCommerce practice for Deloitte in Europe. He and his colleagues at MIT/Tuck have developed an open source SNA tool. You can find and download it at ickn.org. The tool analyses social networks by looking at e-mail patterns. It can be used to understand the communication patterns within work groups and others who communicate through e-mail. Both functional and dysfunctional patterns can be determined and this analysis can provide guidance for corrective action to increase work group productivity. Peter and his colleagues are especially interested in the use of SNA to promote innovation.

vía Portals and KM: Interesting SNA tool at MIT.


Ancient Scripts: Maya

noviembre 7, 2010

The second cycle, the tzolk’in, is not divided into months but contains two parallel cycles, one of 13 and the other of 20. The cycle of 13 are identified by numbers, but the cycle of 20 has days with names.

And the following are the signs of the tzolk’in ritual cycle.

The keeping of the tzolk’in is still practiced among modern Maya, especially by Maya nations of highland Guatemala such as the Quiché or the Kakchiquel. The practioners are called “daykeepers”, are open to both genders, and they also serve functions such as diviners, midwives, and bonesetters.

 

vía Ancient Scripts: Maya.


Mesoweb Publications

noviembre 7, 2010

Abaj Takalik 1976: Exploratory Investigations – by J. A. Graham, R. F. Heizer and E. M. Shook

The Age and Provenance of the Leyden Plate – by Frances R. and Sylvanus G. Morley

Analysis of Two Low Relief Sculptures from La Venta – by Robert F. Heizer

Archaeology: The Plates – by Alfred P. Maudslay

Blom and La Farge and the Discovery of La Venta – by Frans Blom and Oliver La Farge

A Brief Note on the Name of a Vision Serpent – by Linda Schele

Charnay and Maudslay at Yaxchilan – by Désiré Charnay

Colossal Heads of the Olmec Culture – by C. William Clewlow, Richard A. Cowan, James F. O’Connell & Carlos Benemann

A Correlation of the Mayan and European Calendars – by J. Eric Thompson

Deities Portrayed on Censers at Mayapan – by J. Eric S. Thompson

Drawings of Glyphs of Structure XVIII, Palenque – by Miguel Angel Fernandez

El Enigma de los Olmecas – by Wigberto Jiménez Moreno

Excavation of a Colonnaded Hall at Mayapan – by Howard D. Winters

Excerpts from the Researches of Teobert Maler – with a short biography

The Great Mound of La Venta – by John Graham and Mark Johnson

The Hero Twins: Myth and Image – by Michael D. Coe

Hieroglyphs on Maya Vessels – by David Stuart

The History of the Study of Maya Vase Painting – by Mary Ellen Miller

The Inscriptions from Temple XIX at Palenque – by David Stuart

La Venta, Tabasco: A Study of Olmec Ceramics and Art – by Philip Drucker

Maya Astronomy – by John E. Teeple

Maya Chronology: The Correlation Question – by J. Eric Thompson

Maya Chronology: The Fifteen Tun Glyph – by J. Eric Thompson

Maya Hieroglyphic Writing: Introduction – by J. Eric S. Thompson

The Mercado, Chichen Itza, Yucatan – by Karl Ruppert

A New Method of Deciphering Yucatecan Dates with Special Reference to Chichen Itza – by J. Eric Thompson

Popol Vuh: The Sacred Book of the Quiché Maya – translated by Allen J. Christenson

Recollections of My Early Travels in Chiapas – by John Bourne

A Reconsideration of the Age of the La Venta Site – by Rainer Berger, John A. Graham and Robert F. Heizer

Representation of Deities of the Maya Manuscripts – By Dr. Paul Schellhas

Ruins of Polol and Other Archæological Discoveries in the Department of Peten, Guatemala – by Cyrus Longworth Lundell

Sculptures and Rock Carvings at Chalcatzingo, Morelos – by Carmen Cook de Leonard

Sources of Rocks Used in Olmec Monuments – by Howel Williams & Robert F. Heizer

Stone Monuments of Southern Mexico – by Matthew W. Stirling

Stone Sculptures from the Finca Arevalo, Guatemala – by S. K. Lothrop

Structure A-XVIII, Uaxactun – by A. Ledyard Smith

Studies on the Inscriptions of Chichen Itza – by Herman Beyer

A Study of Classic Maya Sculpture – by Tatiana Proskouriakoff

A Stylistic and Chronological Study of Olmec Monumental Sculpture – by Carl William Clewlow, Jr.

Two Recent Ceramic Finds at Uaxactun – by A. Ledyard Smith

Votive Axes from Ancient Mexico – by Marshall H. Saville

The Yaxuna-Cobá Causeway – by Alfonso Villa R.

Mesoweb Publications.


WAYEB – European Association of Mayanists – Homepage

noviembre 7, 2010

Welcome to WWWayeb!

Please check out our most popular sections:

Membership

Administer your membership online. Join Wayeb and support the Association’s activities.

more…

Wayeb Notes

No. 35 from Christophe Helmke on the transferral of ritual privileges in Yaxchilan has recently been issued. Publish your research here!

more…

Who is Who?

Create your own profile and be part of the online community of Maya researchers. Search others who have already signed in!

more…

Events Calendar

Find out about symposia and exhibitions on the Maya. Browse the calendar for more information or submit an announcement online.

more…

Wayeb Resources

The WWWayeb eLibrary with research papers, ethnohistorical sources, drawings, theses, photos. Post your own work here!

more…

Latest Contents

Find out about the latest additions of research materials and content updates on WWWayeb. What have you missed since the last visit?

 

WAYEB – European Association of Mayanists – Homepage.


How to Extract Only the Content from a Web Page – olussier.net

octubre 5, 2010

How to Extract Only the Content from a Web Page

Have you ever visited a web page and actually had to take a moment to figure out where the content was because the page was so heavily loaded with non-content stuff? With the growing number of websites, with different designs, one may wish to simply read the page’s content without having to deal with all the extra stuff (navigation, ads, social features…).

The excellent folks at Arc90 have come up with a solution: the Readability bookmarklet. This easy-to-use bookmarklet extracts the main content from a web page and displays it in a simple yet pretty way. You can even customize the style, size and margins to make your reading as enjoyable as possible. The bookmarklet uses a generic algorithm that works on most pages that actually have content. While it is not 100% accurate, they do claim a success rate over 99%. Try it yourself on this page by clicking here!

Here’s a short video that shows how simple and effective it is:

Besides improving the reading experience, there are other great uses to this bookmarklet. First, websites do not always provide printer-friendly versions of their pages. With Readability, you get a clutter-free article ready to be printed. There even is a “Print” button. Also, if you use Evernote with the Web Clipper, you should try using Readability on a page before clipping it. You will end up clipping only the article, which is more likely what you wanted to do!

Using the Readability Algorithm in Your Applications

You can even use the power of Readability if you need to extract web pages’ content in your applications. Some nice folks have ported the algorithm to other languages. See Nirmal Patel‘s Python port here, Keyvan Minoukadeh‘s PHP port here and Immortal‘s C# port here.

vía How to Extract Only the Content from a Web Page – olussier.net.

http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=8798492&server=vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=1&color=&fullscreen=1&autoplay=0&loop=0

Readability – Installation Video for Firefox, Safari & Chrome from Arc90 on Vimeo.


Online Ontology Visualisation: RDFa

octubre 5, 2010

jOWL status updateI packaged the latest development version of jOWL into a 0.5 release, available at Google Code. jOWL is an AJAX/javascript extension to jQuery that I am developing. The jOWL library parses and reasons with OWL-DL documents. Supported browsers for this release are Internet Explorer 7 and Firefox 2 & 3.This release is accompanied by several new and impressive demos in my humble opinion. These make use of the new functionalities that have been incorporated so far. Below are some important highlights.

vía Online Ontology Visualisation: RDFa.


Estadísticas de búsqueda de Google – Interés de Búsqueda en la Web: facebook, hi5, youtube, twitter, uaeh – Hidalgo México, Últimos 12 meses

octubre 4, 2010

vía Estadísticas de búsqueda de Google – Interés de Búsqueda en la Web: facebook, hi5, youtube, twitter, uaeh – Hidalgo México, Últimos 12 meses.


Seguir

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.